| |
|
Catherine Lockstone, CPT Global
• Test schedules are always compressed in some way or another, and testing needs to ensure that what and how we are planning to test makes optimal use of the time we are given.
• Better use of test tools and engagement with the business can enable a reduction in the amount of required testing – both what is planned and what is executed.
• Test Parameterization, Test Coverage tools and techniques, and an understanding of the requirements are the keys to reducing the amount of required testing. This approach co-exists happily with good testing practices (e.g. risk based testing), just refines them and focuses on making best use of the tools we have to use.
|
 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
C.V. Narayanan, Sonata Software
• Explain the limitations of regular automation and how Business Process Testing (BPT) helps testers to overcome these limitations and link testing to business.
• Explain how to create BPT test cases and BPT automation framework.
• Emphasize on how testing teams can adopt BPT and succeed in their projects. |
 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Christopher Eyhorn, Telerik
• A solution for cross browser test automation for rich AJAX applications.
• Challenges of Silverlight test automation and how they can be solved.
• Effective collaboration between software developers and QA professionals for a great team success.
|
|
| |
Joachim Herschmann, Micro Focus
• Choosing the right approach for for test automation – visual testing or scripting.
• SilkTest 2010 visual testing for Business analysts.
• Scripting in Java using Eclipse, VB .Net and C# & using Visual Studio.
|
 |
| |
|
| |
Reginald Stadlbauer, froglogic
• Common pitfalls in GUI test automation.
• Challenges specific to cross-platform testing.
• Designing tests for multiple operating systems and GUI toolkits.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Tracey DeDore & Matthew Morgan, HP Software & Solutions
HP Software & Solutions and Blueprint will share how Agile is transforming quality practices, specifically requirement definition management, across the industry. In this session, learn:
• How to ensure continuous quality using dynamic requirements visualization, management and auto-generation of test scenarios to support iterative development.
• About risk-based quality management and why prioritization of requirements and tests is a key function in Agile.
• How to enable collaboration by using a common repository across stakeholders and establishing full traceability between development plans, user stories, test types and defects.
• How to manage constant change by conducting change impact analysis and managing change as requirements evolve across iterations. |
 |
| |
|
| |
|
Dale Brenneman, McCabe Software, Inc.
• Reducing Risks By Selective Application of Increased Code Coverage.
• Structural Code Coverage Levels: Minimal to Impossible.
• McCabe's Structured Testing: Visualized Path Level Code Coverage.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Rajeev Gupta, iTKO
• As application development becomes more agile and distributed, testing and test infrastructure costs can increase exponentially.
• Test automation is only possible in today’s modern applications when needed components and data are available on an as-needed basis.
• Virtualization can be applied to automate the test lab to reduce cost and time constraints at the hardware, software and system-wide level.
|
|
| |
|
Euan Garden, Microsoft
• Learn about Microsoft’s internal UI test automation engine which is now available with Visual Studio 2010.
• Learn how to use common .Net languages and tools such as C#, VB.net and Visual Studio to develop UI test automation for various different platforms such as HTML, Ajax, Silverlight, SharePoint, Windows Forms and Windows Presentation Foundation.
• Learn how to use multiple different techniques to develop UI test automation such as integrating automation with manual tests, UI verification and data driven testing.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Ronald Keele, Ranorex
• Object-based User Action and Repository Editor.
• Automated Testing of Web & Windows Applications.
• No limits with real C#, VB.NET and XPath-based object identification.
|
|
| |
|
